The London borough of Redbridge proved to be an area of huge advance for
Labour in the council elections.
The incumbent Labour Council added 15 new seats to bring its total
number up to 51. The Tories were reduced to a rump of 12.
The enormity of the achievement is further underlined when placed
against the national result which saw Labour take a total of 77 seats, so
Redbridge actually secured almost 20% of the gains.
The transformation seen in Redbridge over recent years can be measured
by the almost total turn round in Labour’s fortunes over the past decades,
whereby it has literally reversed roles with the Tories going from 51 seats in 1982 to 12 today, with Labour now holding the 51.
So why did Labour do so well in Redbridge? The council has done a good
job over the preceding four years, balancing the budget, whilst absorbing more
than 44% of cuts in budget from central government.
Not only has the council managed to retain most services unmolested but
it has also set forth with a vision for a better future. New leisure centres and
swimming pools have been built.
The borough is smack in the middle of the new Crossrail developments,
with Ilford a major hub on that route. So the area is rising in demand, with
house price rises reflecting that popularity.
All of that said the results were
remarkable. As one of the newly elected councillors for the ward of Wanstead
Village, I can attest at first hand as to the positive response received to
Labour’s message.
Testimony to the conservatism of
Wanstead is that it used to be Winston Churchill’s old constituency. Now, it
has five Labour ward councillors in addition to being represented in Parliament
by Labour MP for Leyton and Wanstead John Cryer. The red tide has really swept
across the area.
There were other wins for Labour in
areas where they were not expected to get anything. South Woodford and
Churchfields for example, are deep in Iain Duncan Smith territory.
Labour took seats right across the
borough.
Another contributory factor was no
doubt a very poor and demoralised Tory Party. The Tory leader Paul Canal
resigned after the carnage of election night, where he himself only just held
onto his seat.
The Labour effort on the ground
played a huge part in defeating the Tories. There was central control and
co-ordination, yet room for innovation in the wards.
In Wanstead Village, we campaigned
for six months, with canvass teams of in excess of ten going out increasingly
over that period. There was some positive campaigns in the local media, such as
one to restore the W12 bus service – its regularity had been cut by TFL.
The Tories were generally trying to
play catch up, taking too long to come on board with the bus campaign and
opposing popular proposals such as the new pool for Wanstead. They also failed
to get the boots on the ground when it came to canvassing.
The negative national media coverage
did not seem to make that much impact. Memorably, I remember one conversation
with a former Tory voter, who initially was coming over because of the swimming
pool. But when canvassed nearer the election itself, he said the media coverage
was so blatantly anti-Corbyn that he could not vote anything but Labour.
The anti-semitism furore probably had
some impact. In Wanstead Village, there were certainly a number of Jewish
voters, who would not give us the time of day.
Labour in Redbridge is typical of the
party in London generally. It is a broad church, with representatives from left
to right of the party. Whatever underlying differences there maybe, all were
put aside for the election, as the party united behind its local programme for
change.
The past record of governing, together
with a changing demographic in favour of Labour, both contributed to success.
The Labour result in Redbridge was typical of the party’s showing in London,
where the Tories divisive often racist policies found little support.
The results hopefully point the way
forward to the day when Labour will win the next general election.
* Published in Briefing
* Published in Briefing