The move by London mayor Sadiq Khan to extend the low
emissions zones out across the capital must be welcomed. It is the type of
radical measure needed if the pollution epidemic, as well as climate change,
are to be addressed.
The regret must be that whilst there do seem to be very real
efforts being made to address the problems caused by motor vehicles, the same
cannot be said for aircraft.
Above our heads, the skies simply fill with ever more
planes. The City Airport capacity has expanded, with Heathrow on the verge of
building another runway.
The old predict and
provide policies of the road builders that have proved so damaging on the
ground, now appear to be replicated in the skies. How much longer before action
is taken on aircraft pollution?
One of the most striking things about many environmental
challenges is that so many seem to demand back to the future solutions. Things
have been done in the name of progress, which in the end are making people less
healthy and putting the future of the planet at stake.
So 25 years ago most children walked to school. Today, many
go to school in motor vehicles, increasing pollution and contributing to the
obesity epidemic amongst children.
It is good to see schemes to get kids and parents out of
their cars and walking to school but why did we go down the driving route in
the first place?
The expansion of air travel
is also a relatively recent development. 30 years ago, there were not
the planes in the air there are today. Are all of those journeys really necessary?
Many regard it as some sort of human right to have a number
of holidays overseas every year. But if the choice is a holiday or the ability
to feed ourselves and save the planet surely that is a no brainer.
The real challenge is to accept that blundering on in this
consumerist style, wasting more and more of the world resources, is not the way
to go. To some extent we need to pull back and start living a bit more simply,
accepting that maybe not everything that has been done on the altar of
producing more profit for a few people is good for everyone.
The recent campaigns to cut the use of plastic marks a
dramatic change. There is a recognition that the world simply cannot go on
poisoning itself, producing plastic and throwing it away.
Less plastic must be produced, simply recycling it won’t
solve the already huge problems the world has to face. If plastic is genuinely
removed from much of daily life, it will mean a different world – maybe simpler
but certainly a more sustainable one.
It is the sort of questions being thrown up by the plastics
revolution that needs to be extended to other destructive practices in the way
we live. If humanity is to survive the present challenges, people need to act
collectively for the common good. A common good that can only be achieved by
living in a simpler way with more concern for each other.
published - Morning Star - 27/6/2018
Wanstead and Woodford Guardian - "Why I support Ulez" - 28/6/2018
http://www.guardian-series.co.uk/news/16320845.column-why-i-support-the-ulez/?ref=fbshr
"How long until action is taken on aircraft pollution?" - print version
Wanstead and Woodford + Ilford Recorder - 14/7/2018
published - Morning Star - 27/6/2018
Wanstead and Woodford Guardian - "Why I support Ulez" - 28/6/2018
http://www.guardian-series.co.uk/news/16320845.column-why-i-support-the-ulez/?ref=fbshr
"How long until action is taken on aircraft pollution?" - print version
Wanstead and Woodford + Ilford Recorder - 14/7/2018