The upheaval that has been the Brexit process has
split the country apart. There was the debate between those who wanted to stay
in the EU and those who wanted to leave.
There was always going to be a loser and winner.
The final margin of victory for leave was so small (4%) that implementation of
the will of the people was always going to leave a large number (48%) of the
country dissatisfied.
If there is a second referendum, with the vote
going the other way, there will be equal dissatisfaction on the leave side.
The Brexit debate also brought the racism present
in society to the fore. Attitudes that many had thought went with the 1970s,
resurfaced, with the referendum vote seemingly providing licence for some to be
openly racist to fellow citizens and those coming in from other countries.
Whatever some might say the anti-migrant atmosphere
that had been growing over the years leading up to the referendum was the major
force driving Brexit.
The terrain was prepared largely by cowardly
politicians unwilling to highlight the benefits of immigration to the country.
Media also played its part, continually framing the debate in the negative terms of which
party promised to reduce the number coming here by the most.
For a number of newspapers, simply economics
dictated that anti-migrant (racist) headlines sold papers.
Another division that has grown due to the Brexit
debate has been that between old and young. There has been a constant line
advanced that old people voted to leave, betraying the young, who in the main
voted to stay.
The actual evidence of these voting patterns seems
a little flimsy.
The young versus old debate though is one that has
been being forumulated in the media over a number of years. It goes that the
older, baby boomer generation had it all – secure well paid jobs, houses and a
clean environment. Because they had/have it the young people are being denied.
The construct is palpably wrong there are a few rich
older and a few rich younger people. Equally, there are many more poor old and
young people just striving to survive.
The division is an intergenerational one of class,
between a few who have most (1%) and the many (99%) who have less.
It is the need to split this overall cake more
fairly across the board that should be the focus, not setting one generation
against the other.
Moving forward into the New Year, the country needs
to come together between generations, races and creeds. We all have more in
common and will prosper from coming together in community, rather than heading
off into sealed off silos getting resentful toward others perceived as being on
the other side. They are not we are all in it together and need to look out for
each other at all times.
published - Wanstead & Woodford Guardian - 27 & 29/12/2018
published - Wanstead & Woodford Guardian - 27 & 29/12/2018
No comments:
Post a Comment